Early mornings and above average organisational skills – that is what it takes to combine university studies with a family life

Studying and raising a family at the same time can be challenging. We interviewed four students to better understand their experiences.

We know it, student life is tough. We might have an idea that family life is not extremely easy, either. What about combining the two? 

Well, the result is a mix of many things: trips to the daycare and to university, studying during breaks or while on the bus, and bracing yourself for “surviving the evenings”.

Ella, 25, from Oulu follows a five-year program in primary school teacher education. She hopes to graduate before Christmas this year. Besides her major, she is studying two long minor qualifications in biology and geography (60 ECTS each). Ella is the mother of an almost 6-year-old child.

David, from Ireland, started his studies at the University of Oulu in 2013. He graduated from the master’s program in Education and Globalisation (EdGlo) and started the Intercultural Teacher Education (ITE) program a short time later. He is also the father of a 5-year-old child. 

Ela B., 31, from Albania was studying her PhD in Business School when she became pregnant with her first child. Because her business studies involved lots of traveling, Ela B. decided to quit her PhD and apply for the ITE program, which she started in January 2017. Now, her first child is almost 4 years old and she has an 8-month-old baby. 

Michelle, 34, is from Aanaar (Inari), Finland. She is a mother of “two and a half children”. The oldest one is five-and-a-half, the second one four, and the third one is due in June. Michelle obtained a bachelor’s degree in Teacher Education, a master’s degree in Philosophy of Indigenous People, and is currently writing her PhD in Saami Culture and Education.

A day in the life of a parent

The day starts early for Ella. She wakes up at 7 am in order to take her daughter to the daycare by 8 am, so she can get to her courses starting at 8:15. Similarly, David and Michelle wake up early, put their children on the bike, ride to the daycare centres, and from there to the University.

Ela B. remembers her first spring of studies as getting up at 6:30 am – very quietly so she wouldn’t wake up her baby – placing the porridge, vitamin D drops, water cup and the bib on the kitchen table, checking the diaper bag, and putting everything on the stroller. 

“I was continuously worried and wondered if it is selfish of me to return to my studies so soon.”

After breastfeeding, Ela B. had to head for the University while her baby remained in the care of her partner.

“I was continuously worried and wondered if it is selfish of me to return to my studies so soon,” she says.

No earlier than at 3 pm in the afternoon, both Michelle and Ella return to daycare to pick-up their children.

“Me and my husband try to alternate between who has a shorter day and is picking up the kids. I am the one who more often picks them up,” says Michelle.

On the other hand, David and Ela B. occasionally have classes or exams scheduled until 6 pm. David finds this incredibly frustrating, as it means problems in arranging care for his kid and spending less time with his little one.

“I have to survive the evenings,” Michelle jokes. Similarly, Ella describes all the chores she has to do in the evening: prepare food, clean, take her child to different hobbies and clubs and find time to visit the gym herself.

“I might sometimes envy the students without children who, after a school day, get to go home and do whatever they want, while my time is spent running from one chore to the next. However, I wouldn’t change places for anything!” Ella admits.

Productivity taken to the next level

All four parents say that combining higher education studies with raising a child takes above average organisational skills.

“I try to write all my essays and reports while I am at the University. Fortunately, I only have a few courses at the moment, so it is possible. There is no way I could see myself managing if I had the same workload as the last couple of years. I take full advantage of the days when my kid is not with me to work, so we can spend as much time as possible when we are together,” David says.

“I think that the most difficult part of combining student life with family life is time management. I carefully plan what I am going to do and when everything has to be done.”

In Ella’s case, if there is still homework to do, she usually does it after her child goes to sleep. The other option is studying in a different room while her husband is playing with the little one. Both options are rather bad, since if she is doing her coursework in a different room, she gets interrupted often, and in the evenings she is already tired herself.

“I think that the most difficult part of combining student life with family life is time management. I carefully plan what I am going to do and when everything has to be done,” she says.

Michelle explains that she, as well, tries to work after nine in the evenings, when her kids are asleep. Sometimes, however, the evenings become chaotic and there is less and less time for working.

Ela B. remembers answering urgent emails or WhatsApp messages and updating her calendar while on the bus home during her first semester as an ITE student. 

Sick days add extra work

Michelle points out that it is particularly difficult to combine studies with parenting when the children fall sick. Her point of view is extremely popular amongst the other interviewees. 

“You are punished for your kid being sick. You get in trouble for missing the lectures. You are required to do extra assignments, which often mean double the workload than attending the actual lecture,” David says.

He adds that a student shouldn’t be expected to choose between family and school, “because there is only one winner”. 

Likewise, Ella explains that the attendance demands of the Faculty of Education (an 80 % or 90 % attendance on the courses is compulsory) can sometimes cause trouble. If her child is sick and she has to stay at home, Ella needs to do extra tasks to compensate for the missed lessons.

“A sick child is already consuming a lot of energy from the whole family. Adding extra tasks on top of that feels unfair.” 

Ella considers that the attendance policy should be changed. If one must be absent due to the child’s illnesses, the compensatory tasks should be skipped. She also considers the attendance policy useless at university level, because each student is responsible for their own learning process. As a result, there is no need to impose attendance requirements.

Financial difficulties hit families 

Compared with working parents, financial strain is one disadvantage studying parents face. From Ela B’s perspective, this is the biggest challenge, because the study benefits are lower than a salary.

“I have been dreaming of living close to a forest in either a row house or a detached house with a yard where the children could just go out, play, and wander safely in nature,” she says. 

David points out that from a financial perspective it is disadvantageous to stay in the University for a long time. That is why there should be more support and flexibility in completing the studies. During summer, students are expected to either work or study. Due to having shared custody, and his kid’s daycare being shut in July, David has few options for summer work. This leaves him with only the study option.

However, due to lack of summer courses conducted in English, David has to take random courses during summer, because there are no courses that would help him make progress in his studies. Still, he needs to study something to receive the student benefits.

Lack of safe space to play

Lack of child-friendly facilities and childcare personnel at the University is another challenge for the students with children. Lastu, the University’s daycare centre located on the Linnanmaa campus, is not really an option, since they offer only part-time childcare. Our interviewees think it would be better if they extended it to full time.

For David, a similar challenge arises because of the distance he has to bike every day. His home, the daycare, and the campus are located far away from each other.

Ela B. found it very easy to bring her children to lectures, groupwork meetings, or social gatherings. The reason being that all her study friends love children and know how to be around them. 

Despite having the same positive experience with teachers and peers, Michelle and David consider bringing their children to lectures not so easy in practice.

“At times, my own strength is being tested. My days are so full and my free time so limited.”

According to them, older children need more attention, disturb the class, or find it boring.

“Five-year-olds don’t sit on a chair for one hour and half,” says David. He and Ela B. think that the University is not a welcoming environment for kids. They say that a small place for children to play indoors, like the ones they have in the shopping centres, would be a good addition to the campus.

The burden of both family life and student life sometimes takes a toll on the mental health of parenting students.

“At times, my own strength is being tested. My days are so full and my free time so limited,” Ella admits.

For PhD students like Michelle, competition is very intense, and funding is secured by good and constant progress. That makes her wonder sometimes if she is doing “a good enough job”. 

Meanwhile, Ela B. feels that it is very difficult to leave her children and go to school when they beg her not to go.

David is annoyed by the University’s outdated perception of a student as being “straight out of high school, with a lot of parental and social support”. 

He underlines the fact that “one rule fits all” is not an inclusive way of designing studying guidelines and policies.

More flexibility needed

Michelle thinks that it would be nice to make it more visible and clearer that the University facilitates balance between working and family life. Ela B. would like to take part in more events organised for students with families. She already took part in the barbecuing event and enjoyed it. Although she couldn’t go to the family concert organized this spring in the University, she found it as a great idea.

From David’s perspective, some teachers don’t understand that there is a life outside school, and that students’ lives in general have changed. He adds that there should be more flexibility in completing studies and clearer guidelines.

Of course, there are positive aspects of combining studies with family life as well.

Michelle enjoys the flexibility offered by her PhD: “I can adapt my working time according to family life.”

“I owe it to my child that I am now doing something I am really passionate about and happy with,” Ela B. explains, because she made the decision of changing her career when she first became pregnant.

Moreover, Ela B. was reading every single book page and article on child development for her degree with immense interest, because she could see all those things on an everyday basis.

“Combining parenthood and teacher studies made me both a better parent and a better teacher.”

Right to rest?

Luckily, the University already had plans on creating childcare rooms on the Linnanmaa campus, which were supposed to be opened at the end of March. Due to the COVID-19 situation and the closing of the university’s premises, the childcare room is not yet in use. Unfortunately, there are no similar plans for the Kontinkangas campus, due to multiple challenges, like the lack of space.

The Student Union of University of Oulu’s (OYY) policy paper mentions flexible studies and a sufficient number of summer courses organised both in Finnish and English, so these are among the aims of OYY’s advocacy work.

On the other hand, all students in Finland are facing problems related to student benefits and holidays. According to Sanna Kangasniemi, the Student Union’s Social Affairs Specialist, last summer (2019) the National Union of University Students in Finland (SYL) made a statement with the headline “Why don’t students have a right to breaks and holifdays?” regarding the fact that students are the only group in Finland with no right to holidays and the related financial support.

“The students are subjected to strict criteria with regard to social assistance. To receive it, they must prove that no suitable summertime courses are available, that they have applied for work, and that all of the student loan to which they are entitled to have been used. In other words, students are required to use loans intended for subsistence while studying, in order to support themselves outside their periods of study”, Kangasniemi says.

In conclusion, the lives of students who are also parents pose both specific challenges and more general ones related to student life. And the solutions are not easy for either. 

But as Ella admitted “The best thing is that, when I return home, I find there the most beloved and important people in my life. That gives me power”.

Anca M. Catana

Education student, theater enthusiast, nature lover. Curious, spontaneous and ambitious, open for new challenges.

Lue lisää:

The Swipe Journey – Can love be found on Tinder?

Tinder is a popular dating app used by millions of people worldwide. How do students in Oulu view the app? Have they found love?

What do you think about Tinder? Do you approach it as a dating facilitator or just as a convenient place to get to know new people? You may like, dislike or just be indifferent to it, but one or more of your friends might contribute to the over one billion swipes the app processes daily. Yep, a billion.

The nature of Tinder is simple. With only a picture and some basic info, you can create a profile. Then, based on your location you will see other users’ profiles and decide if you want to interact with them (swipe right) or not (swipe left). If two users like each other a match and the talk begins.

To know more about the experiences related to this app, we invited people to respond to a survey regarding Tinder. The thirteen responses from Master’s and Ph.D. students depict how the platform is perceived, used and sometimes avoided. Of course, their names have been changed to preserve their anonymity. You know, what happens on Tinder, stays on Tinder.

Opening Tinder

For its developers, Tinder is a social networking app for meeting people. However most users will mention that the main functions of Tinder are finding dates and sexual partners. 

The latter was the case for most of our interviewees before joining the app. At that point, the meaning of “I am on Tinder” to them meant “being single”, “looking around” or just “looking for sex”. 

This tension between points of view seems to be also in academia. Some researchers attribute the rise of apps like Tinder to their diffusion of casual sex. Others, however support that Tinder is more often used for entertainment purposes, locating casual sex being among the least common uses of Tinder.

In that regard, many of our interviewees mentioned using the app to get entertained. That was the case for Malena, post-doc student at the university.

“It used to be something I was doing to kill the time, almost the same as a game on the phone. But I also happened to check the profiles with some friends, a couple of times, just to laugh together.” 

For Beatrice, from Italy, it also began as a game, but later it became something else. “I started using the app just for fun. Me and my friends looked at profiles of people and judged them. That is how I met my actual boyfriend there.” 

Instead of entertainment, others found boredom on Tinder. At least that is Ramon’s perception.

“When people tell me they are on Tinder, I understand they are in the upcycle of loneliness and want to meet people… until they get tired of Tinder always being the same and get bored of it.”

What drives people to Tinder?

According to a study conducted in the Netherlands, people’s motivations to use Tinder can be classified in six categories. Beside the common ones (casual sex and love), the study also mentioned using Tinder to receive positive feedback about one’s appearance, thrill of excitement, ease of communication in online environments, and trendiness. 

When reviewing the motivations of our interviewees to start using the app, we found some similarities. For example, some were looking for a relationship (love), while others were exploring an interest in the same gender, or trying dating again after a break-up (sex / love). Others were curious due to friends’ suggestions to use the app (trendiness). Some started using it to develop flirtation skills or to overcome solitude (ease of communication).

In the case of Julieta, a Master student from Brazil, her response included not one but many of these categories. 

“Flirting in real life wasn’t really working, and I was much shier that I am now. So, it was an interesting way to flirt, have conversations and meet new guys. Also, everybody was already using it, so if I wasn’t there, I would be out of the system.”

A tainted reputation

If there is a wide variety of reasons to join the app, why is Tinder viewed as a hook-up platform? Beatrice offers an explanation after using the app for 5 years. 

“Because many people use Tinder just to find sex, people have a negative opinion of it. But I think that if used in the right way, it  can be a good tool to get to know, interact with and meet new people.”

Many of our interviewees seemed to feel the same way, because of the interesting people they met using the app. For instance Ramón, a Master student from Spain, had a surprising and unexpected encounter thanks to Tinder. He was in India when he matched with a model. 

“I ended up spending my last 3 days in Delhi with her. She took me to the most posh parties and afterwards slept in the slums of Delhi. We would have dated if I lived there, but we still talk.” 

Similarly, when asked about her craziest experience using Tinder, Adele, French exchange student, remembers her first encounter with a stranger. 

“I took the bus to his city, one hour away from mine, and he was supposed to take me back. I was there to meet him after almost one month of chatting. But I did not know him. I had no idea who I might run into. What if something did not go well? Luckily, he drove me home as planned. We kept seeing each other, and now he has been my boyfriend for almost 18 months.”

Despite the good experiences, there are also cases where users, especially women, suffered bad experiences. Angélica and Lyyti had negative experiences in their real-life encounters. After meeting a neighbor through Tinder, Angélica found out that he had a wife and a newborn child he had not told her about.

Lyyti faced a violent situation with a guy when she met him for the first time. “He tried to strangle me, I guess in a sexy, fun way? I did not find it sexy or fun. I never met him again.”

Gendered experiences

Even though many users considered no differences in the practices of men and women while using the app, it was intriguing that many female interviewees expressed they use  different strategies to avoid uncomfortable situations.

For example, identifying potential unwanted profiles (“there are weirdos everywhere, you need to learn how to identify them – and you gain experience with time – and how to avoid them”), elaborating a profile according to your interests (“I wrote a long description because I consider it important, especially when you are looking for something in particular. In my case avoid people who are only looking for one-night stands”), and have a protocol for the first dates (“to meet someone that doesn’t belong in your social network could be dangerous, so it is always an adventure. That’s why you should meet in a public place, never in your own house, or the other person’s house”).

None of the interviewed men mentioned any event related to violence or risk. Maybe the platform just replicates the behaviors of the offline world? Our interviewees mentioned behaviours associated with traditional gender roles. Some examples were passive-active roles (“women tend to be pickier because they are “chased”, and men have to do the chasing”), abusive behavior (“there was too much showing-off and pressure”), and plain machismo (“being a girl on Tinder is a lot worse than being a guy. Girls are quickly insulted and reduced to macho comments”).

According to Yan Asadchy, researcher of online dating culture, although some traditional roles are replicated within these platforms, there is an increasing demand in power for women. For example in India, the female audience is commonly facing straight-up and intolerable harassment, Asadchy says.

This motivated Tinder to implement a “My Move” feature that allows women to choose only they can start conversations after a match. This decision is highly coherent with the design of Bumble, the application that empowers women by putting them in a position where they can decide if they want to write their match or not.

On the contrary to heterosexual users, Fernando and Raija found that gay users may find the use of Tinder easier. For example, Raija found a more relaxed space to develop her curiosity. “I got interested in the same gender and found it very easy to use to Tinder: otherwise there’s a heteronormativity in society. We need to ask people who they’re interested in.”

Similarly, Fernando considered that “there might be roles that heterosexual users have using the app: who approaches whom first, who asks whom out first, and so on. This mirrors heteronormative social roles of men and women. Queer users, on the other hand, tend to disregard these roles.”

The core of Tinder

In an article of 2013, the columnist A. David claimed that Tinder does something “no previous app or dating site ever has before: it makes everyone feel okay about hooking up with near-strangers.”

Even though many interviewees met their long-term partners on Tinder, for Yan Asadchy the design of the Tinder’s interface might drive you away from achieving this goal. “Maybe they really want to find a long-term romantic relationship, but the design of Tinder invites you to behave in a different way.”

In a study about the swipe logic of Tinder, the authors defend that the almost exclusively image-based interactions, the scarce information, the binary response (like or not like), and the awareness of depending on the others according to your location, creates a tension between desire and anxiety.

One swipe after another, the selection can become addictive. In that cycle individuals are diluted, they become a part of the mass. Or as Lyyti says: “the massive ‘selection’ of people that Tinder brings to your fingertips might make other people seem more disposable.”

Dating always causes tension. While both agree to spend some time together, no one knows exactly what the other is expecting. So, the tension between expectations and possibilities of differences are constant. However, on Tinder that complexity is reduced to a simple swipe, a match and a few lines, before making potential contact. Maybe that explains some of our interviewee’s criticism of Tinder.

For instance, for Ramon the app  creates a superficial image of people. He thinks that “overused conversations become meaningless and fail to portrait either of the participants as a person”. On the other hand there is Irma: “communicating through the app made it easier for me to be indifferent towards others and not really care what they thought about me.”

Despite criticism of scholars or users, Tinder is here to stay. The more than 50 million users of the app prove that. So, next time someone brings Tinder up in a conversation, assume nothing and listen. Maybe you will find as many interesting stories as I found while writing this article.

Pablo Santur

Learning specialist in thesis writing mode. Former TV scriptwriter. Foodie. Anime lover. Twitter: @pablodsantur

Lue lisää:

Passion for research – What it’s it like to study a PhD

Mathilde van der Berg arrived from the Netherlands in October 2018. After 16 months of exploring the process of reindeer domestication, she shares her experiences as a doctorate student.

TEKSTI Pablo Santur

KUVAT Pablo Santur

Mathilde van der Berg came to the University of Oulu to become a PhD student in archaeology in 2018.

When did you first want to become a PhD student?

I never wanted to. Actually I am still surprised I have become a PhD student.

But then there was this announcement of an open position going around in the zooarchaeology circles of the internet. It said something like: “we are looking for new methods and interpretations for approaching reindeer domestication”, and well, during my studies people already called me the ‘reindeer girl’ (laughs). So, all the pieces of my interests came together in this position and I applied.

What are your daily activities as a researcher?

That depends on the stage of my research. Last year I have measured a lot of bones for data collection.

I also went to the field with my project. We went to a reindeer farm and I interviewed several Sami reindeer herders.

I have given some lectures and have also been to conferences. Right now I am reading a lot of anthropological and historical literature about reindeer breeding, which I find super interesting. Some days are really mild, and others can be hectic.

Are there differences or similarities between a PhD and your previous studies?

The main difference is that I know where I am going now. I have some deadlines that I set together with my supervisor, and I am executing my research as planned.

There aren’t many courses that I am taking at the moment, compared to being a Bachelor or Master’s student.

During my degree years of studying archaeology in the Netherlands, the classes were really small and my classmates were my friends. Here you have to find friends yourself.

What I really like is that I now meet people that are interested in what I am doing, while in my Bachelor and my Master I felt that nobody really cared about  that. Similarities are that I am still reading a lot of literature, and hanging around bones a lot (laughs).

Is there any particular moment of your PhD that you feel proud of?

After I give a presentation at a conference or in a seminar, I feel relieved but also happy. Afterwards, people sometimes come to me and they can ask some very interesting questions or they tell me about their research and how it is related to mine. Since other people are interested in the same things, I feel that what I do is relevant.

What about challenges?

For me, I am a total insomniac. Some days, I can not be as productive as I would like to be, because I feel like a zombie. If you have sleeping problems your cognitive abilities actually go down quite a bit. This is the major challenge for me in my life and also for my research.

How about the funding?

Luckily my salary is paid from the Domestication on Action project led by Anna-Kaisa Salmi.

But I have heard about struggles with finding funding a lot. Actually some of my PhD friends have to look for funding themselves and they are really busy with this funding issue. A huge amount of their time goes into it rather than actually researching, and often they are very stressed about it.

How was the process of building up your research identity?

I think that process is still ongoing. Maybe the most important thing for me is deciding for myself what to consider for my research, though of course together with my supervisor. You can take several approaches to the same topic or issue, and when I’m defining my own path I feel independent. I also have to look into and decide which journals to publish in or conferences to attend.

Where do you see yourself after finishing your PhD?

I would really like to become a postdoctoral researcher in arctic anthropology or in reindeer domestication. But my deepest dream is actually to go on anthropological fieldwork.

I want to live with a reindeer herding Sami group or reindeer herders in Mongolia for a year, just to see how they live and think. Maybe I could compare their practices and write about it. In short, do anthropological fieldwork and connect it with the research I am doing now.

Pablo Santur

Learning specialist in thesis writing mode. Former TV scriptwriter. Foodie. Anime lover. Twitter: @pablodsantur

Lue lisää:

Linnanmaa, the city center and student experience – what will happen to the campus?

Last Autumn the University of Oulu informed the media they would start an inquiry into the future of the Linnanmaa campus. It was brought up that the campus could be moved to the city center. According to the rector, building a new campus in the city center would be an investment in students, the environment as well as the city.

Read this story in Finnish.

 

The relocation of Linnanmaa campus caused a lot of buzz last autumn. In November the university started an inquiry into a real estate strategy project. The options are the following: renovating  the old buildings, a completely new property built in Linnanmaa or the relocation of the campus to the city center.

The reasons behind the inquiry are the aging campus and the high rent of the property that would rise even higher if the current campus was renovated.

The question is: would the university campus really move to city center? Yes, it would, says the head of the real estate strategy project, rector Jouko Niinimäki.

“There is more to it than the high rent,” Niinimäki starts.

According to the rector, the rent of the property is negotiable. However, there are other problems with the old campus.

“The life cycle of the property is coming to its end. The current campus has functioned well for almost 50 years but the aging means that renovations are needed. It’s either renovation, building a new campus or relocation.”

Why move?

Why then is relocating the best choice?

Niinimäki says that the decision concerns the future of the university and the future generations of students. The amount of students is dropping as age groups approaching university education are smaller. That means that there will be more competition between universities.

“The University of Oulu has to be even more attractive so we can get students from other growth centers as well. The new campus and new location would help the university become a nationwide topic in media”, says Niinimäki.

The relocation to the city center is more a question of reputation rather than property to the rector: it is a way to make the university more appealing. In his speech he repeats the words student experience.

“Nowadays more and more students want to live in the city center. If the university, their hobbies and living would be in the same area, the students would experience the university as more pleasant as well.

According to Niinimäki, it’s important to have easy access to the campus. The new location  is  planned to be near the railway station which would make it easier to commute to the campus when arriving from another city.

“Aalto university and all the other big universities are easy to travel to. A central location would attract more students from the north, south and east alike”, says Niinimäki.

Concerned with carbon

When making plans for the new campus, the environment and carbon emissions will also be considered.

“The Linnanmaa campus is old and the shape of it is flat. We have big glass walls, and the building is far from being energy efficient”, says Niinimäki.

By moving the university to the city center, the need for traveling by car would decrease. That would in turn decrease the carbon emissions of the university.

“The current public transport won’t be able to keep up with combined University of Applied Sciences UAS and University campus. I already get feedback from students about how the buses are too full. We can’t rely on people driving their own cars to campus if we seek carbon neutrality.”

Niinimäki sees transport as a crucial problem regarding student experience. He has read that in Helsinki only one third of the young people get a driver’s license. Niinimäki believes the future generations of students want to continue using public transport to commute to their studies.

A project for the ages

The inquiry into the campus properties is meant to be ready this spring. Niinimäki says that he intends to present the subject to the board of the university in April. The board will decide whether to renovate, rebuild or relocate.

If the board will support the relocation, there is still years before the move would eventually happen. The moving would happen one faculty at a time in the time frame of 2026–2040.

“Most of the current students would not see the new campus as students anymore by the time the relocation happens”, says Niinimäki.

Even though the new plans might feel daunting, Niinimäki is excited. He hopes that the students feel the same positivity.

“Whatever the decision will be, we are always thinking of the well-being of our students. This decision is being made for the benefit of students and their experience.”

The future campus

Even though plans regarding the new campus are still only in the hypothetical phases, ideas regarding the design have been thrown around. Being located near the railway station seems to be fairly set.

Niinimäki thinks having the university in the center of the city would also help bring new life into Oulu.

“Even though the vitality of the city isn’t really a part of university’s tasks, by relocating we could help bring some energy into the city center and make Oulu more appealing as a city.”

Niinimäki mentions the Myllypuro campus of Metropolia as an inspiration for the new property. The brand new Myllypuro campus was designed by Oulu-based architect Rainer Mahlamäki.

So far no official plans for the design of the new university have not been made. However, architect students in Oulu are designing a hypothetical new campus as a part of a course lead by Mahlamäki.

Niinimäki states that the coursework is purely playful, but who knows.

“The new campus would be an investment for the future. I would ask the students not to worry!” Niinimäki concludes

Iida Putkonen

Oulun ylioppilaslehden entinen päätoimittaja. Tiedeviestinnän maisteri ja glögin ympärivuotinen kuluttaja. Etsii revontulia, riippumattoja ja juuri oikeita sanoja.

Lue lisää:

Taking visible steps towards sustainable development – what has the University of Oulu done? 

During the past couple of years, public discussion on sustainability has shifted. The question is no longer whether we need to take action but where do we need to start. Around the world, universities have started to commit themselves to sustainability. To see what action the University of Oulu is taking, we interviewed the Sustainability Planning Officer Anni Huovinen.

Anni Huovinen is a project manager and planning officer for the university’s sustainability projects. The first of her kind, she explains her position to be a person dedicated to sustainability activities and public relations.

One of Huovinen’s tasks has been to design a sustainability website where different kinds of projects, research, and events are presented to the public. She has also invested in a campus-wide event: the Sustainable Development Week.

The idea for the week came from the Advisory Board of Sustainable Development. It was co-organized together with TellUs and the Student Union OYY. The purpose of the week was to raise awareness and to create a campus-wide discussion and an atmosphere towards sustainable development. 

The university launched the Sustainable Development Week on October 7th to 9th, 2019. According to Huovinen, this was the first time that the university had a week focused entirely on sustainability. 

 “It’s a broad enough topic to easily have a sustainability month with events every day,” she comments. 

The week-long event breathed life into the campus via a series of panel discussions, workshops, documentary viewing, and an NGO fair.

Anni Huovinen says the planning started back in April. There was no previous experience or structures, and they had a limited budget to work with. 

In the end, the Week’s planning team incorporated various themes and perspectives into the schedule. For example, OYY proposed perspectives from the Global South in many events, the documentary “The Chocolate Case” as an example.

The Advisory Board of Sustainable Development helped by bringing guest speakers from different sectors, such as the Finnish Environment Institute, other universities and the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Time for feedback

One of the events was “Rector’s Coffee Break” with Jouko Niinimäki, the Rector of The university. There all campus members had the opportunity to learn about and discuss issues in sustainability with the rector. The purpose was to channel feedback and demands for sustainable change from bottom to top.

During the session, a feedback board was set up to directly collect students’ concerns, wishes, demands, or opinions. At the end, 136 notes were collected and later delivered to the rector himself. 

The event came at a good time, since the Strategy of the University of Oulu for the upcoming 4 years is currently being designed. The new Strategy will update the current one and starts its 4-year-term in 2020.

What kind of holistic actions the Strategy implies for sustainability is to be seen. However we can see the university’s ambition towards “sustainable development in the north” and emphasis on “the sustainable use of natural resources” already. 

In this regard, we can expect more action to be taken as the university has started collaborating with the Oulu University of Applied Sciences (Oulu UAS) for common sustainability goals. There are also plans on installing the university’s own solar panels. 

The university’s role

Why is sustainability an issue at universities?

“Universities have great responsibility and agency. They have a lot of power outside the organization,” Anni Huovinen says. 

She explains that universities affect the world in many ways. 

Firstly, the universities accommodate thousands of people including students, faculty, and staff. Secondly, they educate future teachers, citizens, leaders, and consumers. Thirdly, they influence local communities and industries through research and collaboration.

“The university’s values get passed on to people. In that way have a very wide reach in different sectors in society”, Huovinen says. 

She gives an example of a recent event: the Student Union of the University of Helsinki announced that beef would no longer be included in the meals served in all the Ylva’s UniCafes.The goal was to reduce carbon footprint in food consumption.

Soon after, a plethora of news articles covering this issue was published. The case reaching audiences nationwide and created a chain of discussions on meat consumption. This also prompted Uniresta, a restaurant provider in Oulu, to respond

Huovinen explains that besides having influence on discussion and setting examples in societies, universities also affect policy-making decisions through scientific research. 

According to Huovinen, our current society often views universities as useful to the economic system, with the goal to make our GDP grow. However, from this point of view, the additional societal and philosophical purpose of universities might be overlooked and sacrificed. She thinks the purpose and impact of universities needs to be looked into. 

“We should talk more about the role of universities in our society. Are we here to make the economy grow? Is that the purpose of future professionals?”

Individual responsibility in sustainability and coming together

Just as universities can open a nation-wide discussion, individuals together can open a university-wide discussion. In a setting where people often find themselves willing to help but unsure where to start, grass-roots activity can help.

The university’s Advisory Board aims to mobilise different university stakeholders to take action on sustainability, and propose constructive policies to the university’s management team. Currently, open meetings are held on an irregular basis, where all students are encouraged and welcome to join.

The Sustainability Week inspired even the person arranging it, Anni Huovinen. The speech by Arto O. Salonen gave her a new perpective.

“The discussion around sustainability is often focused on the challenge that we can’t let go of our lifestyle: we can’t let go of our cars, and we want to buy a new cell phone every year. I found hope in Salonen’s idea that you are getting a more meaningful life when you let go of things. You become more sustainable and get closer to where you want to be,” she says.

Just as many of us feel hopeless or powerless when being confronted with environmental crises, Huovinen feels the same. Constantly confronting sustainability and the hard facts about climate change sometimes get to her. However there is hope, and what makes her hopeful is a new empowered generation willing to push for a change.

“The new generation have a very different view on consuming. They grew up in a new paradigm, where we can not continue living in certain ways, even though they might be seen as normal in our society.” 

 

Ending note from the writers:

We as students want to add that we hope to see concrete action by the university to fight climate change. This can mean increasing teaching about climate change and sustainability issues, creating more opportunities for collective action, unifying stakeholders through creative ways, and reducing the university’s operation carbon footprint.

At the same time, we also appeal to all our peers to become active. Find ways to get involved with larger groups that are working for sustainable development. In the end, all of us together create the sustainable changes we want to see in the environmental, social, and economic systems.

 

Written by Thea Yan Pan and Filip Polák 

Thea Yan Pan

Studying in the Education and Globalisation program. Originally from China and currently interested in collaborating with students from different faculties to make our university more sustainable.

Lue lisää:

“Could your classmates translate this for you?” – The beauty and pain of multilingualism at the University of Oulu

University of Oulu has about 1,900 students every year who use English as their primary studying language. This includes exchange students, international degree students and postgraduate students. But how well does the University meet the needs of its English speaking students? Anca M. Catana discusses the issue.

‘Could your classmates translate this for you?’

I don’t know how often you heard this statement from lecturers during your studies at the University of Oulu, but during my 3 years of studying the Intercultural Teacher Education (ITE) programme I heard it, a lot!

Short answer: no, they can’t. And that is not because they don’t possess the skills. Most of them do.

But is it really their job to do that? Are they rewarded for it somehow? Or are they eventually losing more than gaining by doing this?

Let’s start with the first question: Is it really my classmates’ job to translate the lesson content or the instructions of the assignments to us? If we think about professional interpreters, they usually have studies in the field and their earning starts from 40 euros per hour.

Do my classmates have the same level of education? Not really. Are they receiving any financial reward near that? Nope.

Actually, the amount of information that reaches everyone in this manner is problematic. The ‘helpful classmate’ will probably lose a good share of the lecture. And the part that is finally reaching us is probably less than half.

The result is a lose-lose situation for everybody: our classmates, us and the teachers who don’t get to do their job as well as they would like to.

How much is the teachers’ responsibility?

I occasionally hear fellow international students complain about teachers and teaching. Of course it is tempting to blame those whose job is to make sure that their classes are accessible and inclusive.

On the other hand, based on my experience, teachers often blame the limited number of contact lessons, the cutting of the funds or the general decisions made at a higher level for the difficulties encountered by the foreign students.

From my perspective, in the Faculty of Education at least, teachers face different challenges. Based on those, they could be divided into three categories: the ones teaching exclusively in Finnish, the ones teaching exclusively in English and the ones teaching both in Finnish and English.

The first two categories are probably doing fine most of the time. Teachers prepare the content of the lesson in one language and deliver it as many times as necessary. What occasionally happens is that the non-Finnish speaking students have to take part in the Finnish-taught classes or the other way around. The most common reason is that they missed the lesson conducted in English/Finnish and now they have to make up for it. Both Finnish-speaking and English-speaking students seem to suffer in this situation and extra support is offered only sometimes.

The third category of teachers is probably more challenged due to the fact that besides preparing the material in one language, the teacher has to prepare it once more in a second language. Is that the same amount of work as for teachers in categories one and two? Nope, I’d say it’s at least double the work. Are teachers rewarded enough for all the extra effort? Probably not, considering their commitment shown during the lessons.

In the Faculty of Education alone, there are some 45 international students admitted annually to the Masters and ITE programmes and the number is doubled by the number of exchange students.

The situation affects the international students in different ways. For example, I’ve noticed that some of the teachers who conduct their lessons both in English and Finnish seem to be less motivated or less resourceful when teaching the English version. Moreover summer courses are scarce (only two of them are held in English), optional courses are rarely offered in English, and for the ITE students it’s a challenge to find a Minor Subject. Under these circumstances, the option of joining a class taught in Finnish comes at hand. The teachers will most likely welcome you. But even if they are well intended, they frequently lack the instruments needed to save you from drowning.

Are there any solutions?

One easy way to solve the language problem would include not having any international students without Finnish skills, at all.

However, we’re still aiming for an international, multilingual, multicultural, inclusive university, right? Not to forget the tuition fees that range from 10,000 to 13,000 euros.

If we’re really aiming for an international university, these positive expressions should be acted upon, not just left to decorate university’s web site and posters.

Going back to ‘Can your classmates translate this for you?’, even though the way it happens today doesn’t really work, the basic idea could still be used in another form.

What about inviting students from the English philology programme, or any other students who feel up to the task, to act as semi-professional interpreters, but in a more organised and rewarding way? It would be essential that the students in question are not registered to that respective course, so they don’t have to learn the content they need to translate. They should also be rewarded somehow, either by credits or by payment.

Teachers could help by handing out a summary of the lesson to the interpreter before the actual lesson, or they could simply speak at a slower pace.

Here’s couple of other ways in which the teachers can help their non-Finnish speaking students catch up with what is happening. They can write clearly and explicitly in English what the assignments to that course are and how it is assessed, because in the end that is what hurts us the most. Even making a list with key-terms in English and Finnish might be a useful tool for teachers, Finnish and non-Finnish students alike.

Regarding the teachers, I’d say one of the major things is that they need more support in delivering their lessons to their non-Finnish speaking students. It’s not only my personal opinion, but what other fellow non-Finnish students I encountered suggest.

Supporting the development of staff’s English skills is a long-term investment from which everyone will benefit.

Secondly, there should be reward for those lecturers who do extra work when having English-speaking students in the Finnish-taught classes, or who teach in two or more languages, even if the lesson content is the same.

I still remember the situation I witnessed during my very first weeks of studies at this University. An exchange student ran out of the class crying, because the class was taught completely in Finnish. She was supposed to take it as part of her study agreement, and the class was supposed to be designed for international students.

What I truly believe is that with the right effort, time and financial investment and a bit of courage and interest situations like that could be avoided in the future.

Then the University of Oulu could indeed become ‘a model of multiculturalism’ as the Rector Jouko Niinimäki wrote on his blog on March 1st 2019.

 

This story was originally published on Oulu Student Magazine’s second print issue of the year, on 11th of April 2019.

Read more: Language can bring community together or break it apart.

Anca M. Catana

Education student, theater enthusiast, nature lover. Curious, spontaneous and ambitious, open for new challenges.

Lue lisää: